Residents report a place
Location, problem type, destinations, walking frequency, and an optional photo or note.
Simple and transparent
Residents tell us what they experience. We combine that information with public data to help show where pedestrian improvements may have the greatest need.
Location, problem type, destinations, walking frequency, and an optional photo or note.
Where available: traffic, crashes, schools, transit, destinations, sidewalk gaps, and existing or planned projects.
The proposed MVP score is Safety 30% + Demand & destinations 25% + Connectivity 20% + Accessibility & community need 15% + Community evidence 10%.
Each location explains why it ranks where it does and how confident we are in the underlying data.
A priority score is a community planning signal, not an official Town ranking and not a promise that a sidewalk will be built. Engineering feasibility, right-of-way, cost, environmental constraints, funding, Town plans, and public process still matter.